TX Lightning Gold vs. Chivas

by Seinfeld4 4/15/2015, 11:37 am

The game was played on Saturday and the score is still not updated. Anything interesting happen in this game?

by omega striker 4/15/2015, 6:17 pm

come on babyhippo where you at with the details

by Abejide 4/15/2015, 9:04 pm

3 - 3 was the final...nothing interesting other than lightning scoring 2 in last 10 mins.

by babyhippo 4/15/2015, 10:34 pm

And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

by soccerdadrandy 4/15/2015, 11:06 pm

babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

these cheating coaches are REPULSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by nearpost95 4/15/2015, 11:18 pm

babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?

by babyhippo 4/16/2015, 6:04 am

nearpost95 wrote:
babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?

Coach recognized players and their #'s no Bueno !!

by Reality Check 4/16/2015, 6:11 am

babyhippo wrote:
nearpost95 wrote:
babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?
Coach recognized players and their #'s no Bueno !!

so did the REF call the game? and why is it that 99 age group seems to have so much cheating going on? i mean moreso than other age groups and why is it tolerated?

by SnookumsConCarne 4/16/2015, 7:56 am

Reality Check wrote:
babyhippo wrote:
nearpost95 wrote:
babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?
Coach recognized players and their #'s no Bueno !!
so did the REF call the game? and why is it that 99 age group seems to have so much cheating going on? i mean moreso than other age groups and why is it tolerated?

My gosh!
What is this teaching the ineligible kid and his teammates? (If this is true about the kid being ineligible).
That it's cool or tolerated to cheat?!?
Classic League needs to step up and permanently ban the coaches AND kids that are caught.
At the age of 13 to 18 or older, these kids know that what they're doing is wrong.
And their sorry-@$$ed parents are pieces of crap!
They're cheating other kids for what?

by Seinfeld4 4/16/2015, 9:30 am

babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So, what is the punishment to Chivas for playing ineligible players. Just the loss of this one game?

by Seinfeld4 4/16/2015, 9:32 am

Reality Check wrote:
babyhippo wrote:
nearpost95 wrote:
babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?
Coach recognized players and their #'s no Bueno !!
so did the REF call the game? and why is it that 99 age group seems to have so much cheating going on? i mean moreso than other age groups and why is it tolerated?

These are great questions. It does seem to happen a lot in the 99 age group. Seems to be the same teams are involved year after year.

by omega striker 4/16/2015, 11:40 am

Seinfeld4 wrote:
Reality Check wrote:
babyhippo wrote:
nearpost95 wrote:
babyhippo wrote:And the fact Chivas were playing ineligible players ,,,, again. Lightning Gold awarded the 1-0 win for their efforts

So the roster check was ineffective? How was it determined that ineligible players were used in the game?
Coach recognized players and their #'s no Bueno !!
so did the REF call the game? and why is it that 99 age group seems to have so much cheating going on? i mean moreso than other age groups and why is it tolerated?

These are great questions. It does seem to happen a lot in the 99 age group. Seems to be the same teams are involved year after year.

and just to add another slap in the CL will tell you oh the kid sat it out in a tourney but yet still no proof just word of mouth from team manager to league Rolling Eyes

by claretiano 4/16/2015, 12:17 pm

Why is classic league allowing this coach and team to continue doing this. I don't think this is his first offense.

by Reality Check 4/16/2015, 1:05 pm

claretiano wrote:Why is classic league allowing this coach and team to continue doing this. I don't think this is his first offense.

I was doing some research and it looks like this chivas formerly deportivo alacranes and real gp have much history with this so yea i feel classic league and north texas both has some explaining to do.

by nearpost95 4/16/2015, 2:39 pm

There is a difference between playing non-rostered players and having a rostered player in a game for which he was to serve a card-related suspension. Which is it?

by Abejide 4/16/2015, 4:43 pm

Interesting!!! at least they got caught. Now we'll see what the punishment is If any.

by omega striker 4/16/2015, 4:44 pm

nearpost95 wrote:There is a difference between playing non-rostered players and having a rostered player in a game for which he was to serve a card-related suspension. Which is it?

I believe both of the teams mentioned have done both