Will they get paid?

http://www.topdrawersoccer.com/club-soccer-articles/dallas-texans-monitor-hyndman-move-closely_aid39358

Good read, also delves into some knowledge of what can happen if your kid is noticed and makes it through to a professional contract.

Out of curiosity... Did Hyndman's family pay for him to play for the Texans at any point?  

If the answer is "No", then I think the Texans are justified in this pursuit of compensation.  

If the answer is "Yes", then I think the Texans shouldn't be awarded anything as they've already been compensated when the services were initially rendered.

bigtex75081 wrote:Out of curiosity... Did Hyndman's family pay for him to play for the Texans at any point?  

If the answer is "No", then I think the Texans are justified in this pursuit of compensation.  

If the answer is "Yes", then I think the Texans shouldn't be awarded anything as they've already been compensated when the services were initially rendered.

WWSBMD? What Would Soap-Box Mom Do?

bigtex75081 wrote:Out of curiosity... Did Hyndman's family pay for him to play for the Texans at any point?  

If the answer is "No", then I think the Texans are justified in this pursuit of compensation.  

If the answer is "Yes", then I think the Texans shouldn't be awarded anything as they've already been compensated when the services were initially rendered.

THEY ARE NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR MONIES SPENT TRAINING HYNDMAN. THEY ARE BEING COMPENSATED FOR BEING INVOLVED. LIKE A LOTTERY. FIFA SAYS THEY GET PAID. US SOCCER WANTS THE MONEY. WHAT DID US SOCCER DO WHILE HE WAS AT THE TEXANS?

bigtex75081 wrote:Out of curiosity... Did Hyndman's family pay for him to play for the Texans at any point?  

If the answer is "No", then I think the Texans are justified in this pursuit of compensation.  

If the answer is "Yes", then I think the Texans shouldn't be awarded anything as they've already been compensated when the services were initially rendered.

if the answer is "no", then the parents whose kids sat the bench and were signed for the money, so that the scholarship could be offered, should be compensated.

nearpost95 wrote:

bigtex75081 wrote:Out of curiosity... Did Hyndman's family pay for him to play for the Texans at any point?  

If the answer is "No", then I think the Texans are justified in this pursuit of compensation.  

If the answer is "Yes", then I think the Texans shouldn't be awarded anything as they've already been compensated when the services were initially rendered.

if the answer is "no", then the parents whose kids sat the bench and were signed for the money, so that the scholarship could be offered, should be compensated.

and Merrill Lynch should reimburse them for all of their poor stock choices? lmao from 2012 "Chick-fil-A has provided more than $30 million in Leadership Scholarships to more than 30,000 restaurant team members who have attended more than 3,100 colleges, universities, and other educational institutions". because i pay full price for my meals. i find this preposterous. they should give me some of my money instead of using charitable dollars as they choose.

...and remember "you didn't build that", the assertion that those who collectively paid for the roads, schools, etc, should benefit directly from the success of the enterprise.

delete

Wasn't FCD his last team before Europe? So why aren't Texans suing them, too?

I hear his U-6 coach is suing Texans....

S0cc3rD@d wrote:Wasn't FCD his last team before Europe? So why aren't Texans suing them,  too?

I hear his U-6 coach is suing Texans....

Because FCD isn't involved. They get money too

Simply put, if you pay 100 percent to train and develop within a club system then the club should forfeit your fees.

On the other hand, if the club pays for your training and development then it is reasonable to accept that the club should be reimbursed with profit for the gamble they took developing the payment free player.

The value of reimbursement works as a stimulus to develop potentially talented players regardless of their ability to pay.

This financial mechanism alters the club's mentality towards player development since there are monetary rewards to be had from their efforts.

Clubs that offer free academy training will benefit from this financial reimbursement the most and will usually have the highest degree of team success and player appreciation.

PremierLeagueFan wrote:Simply put, if you pay 100 percent to train and develop within a club system then the club should forfeit your fees.

On the other hand, if the club pays for your training and development then it is reasonable to accept that the club should be reimbursed with profit for the gamble they took developing the payment free player.

The value of reimbursement works as a stimulus to develop potentially talented players regardless of their ability to pay.

This financial mechanism alters the club's mentality towards player development since there are monetary rewards to be had from their efforts.

Clubs that offer free academy training will benefit from this financial reimbursement the most and will usually have the highest degree of team success and player appreciation.

its not a reimbursement for any individual. ITS A REWARD!!! those $$$$$ can be used to buy club owner a Plane or used to lower cost for players.

huge part of it I think is, there’s no incentive in this country for the development of players,” Embick said. “In Europe, that’s how some clubs survive. They promote youth, they stay mid-table, sell their kid off for $20 million when they get a special one and that funds the club for a while. They might not have the funds to compete and win it all, but they can develop.
“Here, the Cleveland Internationals have I think eight guys in MLS. Well, their kids have to pay to play in their academy because there’s no funding to help it. If they would’ve gotten money for those eight kids in MLS, that means another 40 kids don’t have to pay. Those things I think over time help. The message is hey, we might not win this, but we can produce maybe another Darlington Nagbe we can sell, and things are different.”

http://www.topdrawersoccer.com/the91stminute/2016/07/the-mlspu-is-on-the-wrong-side-of-the-training-compensation-fight/

soccerdadrandy wrote:

PremierLeagueFan wrote:Simply put, if you pay 100 percent to train and develop within a club system then the club should forfeit your fees.

On the other hand, if the club pays for your training and development then it is reasonable to accept that the club should be reimbursed with profit for the gamble they took developing the payment free player.

The value of reimbursement works as a stimulus to develop potentially talented players regardless of their ability to pay.

This financial mechanism alters the club's mentality towards player development since there are monetary rewards to be had from their efforts.

Clubs that offer free academy training will benefit from this financial reimbursement the most and will usually have the highest degree of team success and player appreciation.

its not a reimbursement for any individual. ITS A REWARD!!! those $$$$$ can be used to buy club owner a Plane or used to lower cost for players.

If the club squanders the money instead of reinvesting it in future club talent then they will go the way of the dinosaurs. The entire system separates the wheat from the chaff and rightly rewards clubs that see players as an asset and not an expense

PremierLeagueFan wrote:

soccerdadrandy wrote:

PremierLeagueFan wrote:Simply put, if you pay 100 percent to train and develop within a club system then the club should forfeit your fees.

On the other hand, if the club pays for your training and development then it is reasonable to accept that the club should be reimbursed with profit for the gamble they took developing the payment free player.

The value of reimbursement works as a stimulus to develop potentially talented players regardless of their ability to pay.

This financial mechanism alters the club's mentality towards player development since there are monetary rewards to be had from their efforts.

Clubs that offer free academy training will benefit from this financial reimbursement the most and will usually have the highest degree of team success and player appreciation.

its not a reimbursement for any individual. ITS A REWARD!!! those $$$$$ can be used to buy club owner a Plane or used to lower cost for players.

If the club squanders the money instead of reinvesting it in future club talent then they will go the way of the dinosaurs. The entire system separates the wheat from the chaff and rightly rewards clubs that see players as an asset and not an expense

True but FIFA says they get the money to squander if they so choose