'98 - Dallas Texans Fall Festival Brackets

Boys U14 Red

Bracket A
N/A: DALLAS TIGRES ACADEMY DALLAS TIGRES 98B GOLD
N/A: FORT WORTH FC 98B WHITE (TXN) N/A: HOUSTONIANS FC HOUSTONIANS 98 RED (TXS) N/A: OKLAHOMA FOOTBALL OFC 98 BOYS (OK)
Bracket B
N/A: KICKS 98B (TXN) N/A: MIGHTY BLUEBIRDS MBS RED (AR) N/A: SOLAR 98B (TXN) N/A: WICHITA LIGHTNING 98 WICHITA LIGHTNING (KS)
Bracket C

N/A: AKFC 98 UNITED (AK)
N/A: DALLAS TEXANS 98B (TXN) N/A: PUMAS ELITE SC '98 BOYS (TXN) N/A: TEXANS 98 HOUSTON (TXS)

Boys U14 White 1
Bracket A
N/A: DALLAS TEXANS 98B RED DALLAS (TXN) N/A: GUAMERU SC (PREV. PACHUCA ACADEMY) (TXN) N/A: SANTOS LAGUNA SC98 (TXN) N/A: TEXANS 98 HOUSTON RED (TXS)
Bracket B
N/A: ANDROMEDA FC 98B (FORMERLY ASG 98B GOLD WEST) (TXN) N/A: AYSES 98 BOYS GOLD (TXN) N/A: FC DALLAS YOUTH FC DALLAS 98B BLUE (TXN) N/A: FC HAWKS (TXN)
Bracket C
N/A: ANDROMEDA FC 98B GOLD (FORMERLY ASG98BGOLDNORTH) (TXN) N/A: HURST UNITED FC HUFC 98 BOYS BLACK (TXN) N/A: LAKE HIGHLANDS UNITED F.C. 98B (TXN) N/A: LIVERPOOL 98B (TXN)

Boys U14 White 2

Bracket A
N/A: AMARILLO LIGHTNING SC 98 B (TXN) N/A: BIXBY SHEFFIELD EAGLES '98 (OK) N/A: SAINTS 98B (TXN) N/A: VALENCIA FC 98B (TXN)
Bracket B
N/A: LIVERPOOL FC AMERICA LIVERPOOL 98 BOYS BLACK (TXN) N/A: LONESTARS 98B RED EAST (TXS) N/A: TEXAS XTREME FC 98B (TXN) N/A: TWISTERS UNITED '98 (TXN)

I got Tigres vs Solar(castro) in the finals with Tigres winning!

omega striker wrote:I got Tigres vs Solar(castro) in the finals with Tigres winning!

I'll say Houstonians vs. Solar w/ Houstonians winning.

White 1 - I'll pick Guameru over Ayses in the final.

Just looked at the schedule and they flipped Ayses Gold and FWFC White.

Ayses in Red, FWFC in White 1

IC75 wrote:Just looked at the schedule and they flipped Ayses Gold and FWFC White.

Ayses in Red, FWFC in White 1

Why would they switch those 2? Did FWFC hammer Ayses a couple of weeks ago in Classic League?

Only thing I can figure Ayses finished 3rd, FWFC 5th in DII.

Ayses are really ON or really OFF

Sounds like tonight they were ON ... 2-1 over Tigres

M Patient wrote:Ayses are really ON or really OFF

Sounds like tonight they were ON ... 2-1 over Tigres

and Tigres wa really really off

DT 98 1-0 Pumas

Solar 2 mighty bluebirds 0
Tigres 3 OCFC 0
Ayses gold 3 houston texans 1

omega striker wrote:Solar 2 mighty bluebirds 0
Tigres 3 OCFC 0
Ayses gold 3 houston texans 1

Anyone know the Liverpool(Woody)v Andromeda(ASG GN) game from last night....Still not posted going on 24 hours....

liebevin wrote:

omega striker wrote:Solar 2 mighty bluebirds 0
Tigres 3 OCFC 0
Ayses gold 3 houston texans 1

Anyone know the Liverpool(Woody)v Andromeda(ASG GN) game from last night....Still not posted going on 24 hours....

AndroFC 1 Liverpool 0

Congrats to Solar. What a run by Ayses Gold. Started out in the white division when brackets were released and ended with a 2nd place trophy. With impressive wins over last years' DC runner up and the 2nd place team in D1. Did the Dallas Texans figure it out. Lose 2-1 to eventual champs.

man in the mirror wrote:Congrats to Solar. What a run by Ayses Gold. Started out in the white division when brackets were released and ended with a 2nd place trophy. With impressive wins over last years' DC runner up and the 2nd place team in D1. Did the Dallas Texans figure it out. Lose 2-1 to eventual champs.

NOPE

As a matter of fact, yes. Solar, while a solid team, has but two very fast forwards, one particularly gifted at that (should be playing PA, but due to not having the Solar "in" to begin with ...) There's the secret. Everyone is shocked, I know.

They got away from a 2-2 tie by the hair on their chinny chin chins ... right Go?

not quite it was a game controlled by solar. If all they have are 2 fast gifted forward they why can't they score any goals? Solar has struggled to find the net all season. Texan game was no different. They out shot the texans but didn't get anything in the net. The main difference between the Texan game and the finals was that they actually made the shots in the finals. Texans will bring in some help for Dallas cup. Without it, it will be a very long (or guess I should say short) Dallas cup.

BTW the kid that should be Pre Academy is the center back (best kid on the field by far). Watch the team a little closer because what is so obvious is also so wrong.

go99 wrote:not quite it was a game controlled by solar. If all they have are 2 fast gifted forward they why can't they score any goals? Solar has struggled to find the net all season. Texan game was no different. They out shot the texans but didn't get anything in the net. The main difference between the Texan game and the finals was that they actually made the shots in the finals. Texans will bring in some help for Dallas cup. Without it, it will be a very long (or guess I should say short) Dallas cup.

BTW the kid that should be Pre Academy is the center back (best kid on the field by far). Watch the team a little closer because what is so obvious is also so wrong.

Again, less is more ...

yes it is. Out shot, out possessed, and in the end lost. Was not a game they were going to win.

blah blah blah, Go. Where is the emo with the tongue sticking out when you need it? Oh well, just Go with the image.

Gloat all you want. DT may or may not have a rough Go in DC, but it's better than NO Go at all.

oh without a doubt it is better but don't worry HN will bring in some players and make a run of the DC, he always does. No gloating here solar beat texans whoopee big deal. Right now that makes us good enough to stay in D1 but not much else. I was just asking the posters question and from what I saw the texans weren't any different than the first time we saw them so I answered nope.

But to your point, if those 2 amazing forwards had scored against the pumas the team would be going to DC.

go99 wrote:oh without a doubt it is better but don't worry HN will bring in some players and make a run of the DC, he always does. No gloating here solar beat texans whoopee big deal. Right now that makes us good enough to stay in D1 but not much else. I was just asking the posters question and from what I saw the texans weren't any different than the first time we saw them so I answered nope.

But to your point, if those 2 amazing forwards had scored against the pumas the team would be going to DC.

But they didn't, and you're not, so quit taking your angst out on others. As a matter of fact I would like to see that forward AND that defender play in DC; they deserve it.

Just as long as you stay home.

BU - leave GO alone. He is just bitter that little Go gets about 10 mins per game. But hey, he is on the team that dominated the Texans (2-1)!